Skip to content

Taking the Cure to Stop Violence

August 29, 2016

staff and serpentDoctor Gary Gonsalves is an anesthesiologist in southern California.  He saw an article in a medical journal that said the recent flood of gun-regulations in California was only a good start, but probably not enough.  The article also called for more government funded anti-gun propaganda and more “gun-control”.   I helped Dr Gonsalves with facts and references.  Here is our article.  A revised edition appeared in his medical journal today.

“Taking the Cure to Stop Violence” by Gary Gonsalves, M.D. and Rob Morse

In reference to Dr. Rita Agarwal’s “Gun Violence: When will we make a change, she makes an emotional appeal for “gun control” while conveniently ignoring the science that she calls on us to embrace:

  • Agarwal cries, that the Center for Disease Control should study “gun violence”.  I think we should examine the extensive research that already exists.  Data from the 1970’s to current day will be presented here.
  • Agarwal says we don’t know the cause of violence. I say the etiology is obvious, but we all recognize the difficulties in changing social dynamics, so some of us acquiesce to the less challenging course of blaming-and-banning inanimate objects.
  • Agarwal says that violence with a firearm is more prevalent in United States than in other countries. I’ll present data clearly confirming that the United States is among the safest countries on earth.
  • Agarwal implies that guns cause violence. I will show you the reports demonstrating that armed individuals stop violent crimes hundreds-of-thousands of times per year.

So let’s look at the facts, while being sensitive to emotions elicited by hysterical claims and the toxic effects of interpersonal violence.

The fact is that we are not facing an epidemic of armed violence in the United States.  Rates of armed homicide declined 50% over the last 30 years while firearms ownership has doubled (1)(2).  Further, the U.S. is ranked 11th for the incidence of mass murder per 100 thousand when compared against European countries. The U.S. is more peaceful per person than France, Switzerland, Norway or Belgium during the last 7 years (3). While statistics don’t and shouldn’t change our emotional reaction to human suffering, when properly employed, they can provide a foundation for critical analysis.  So let’s consider the research.

In 2013, The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, in cooperation with the CDC, outlined potential research via “Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence”, but we need not await their results as ample research already indicates that, at a minimum, 4 out of 5 criminals obtain their firearms illegally (4)(5)(6).  Intuitively, we all know that criminals don’t care if they follow gun laws, which explains why gun laws have no effect on the rate at which criminals use firearms.  I have no way to know if Dr. Agarwal is aware of these findings, but I am certain that the new California gun control laws that she calls a “good first step”, are anything but (7).  Rather, they are merely seven more laws added to the already existing 23 thousand gun control laws at the local, state and federal level.  While it may seem cliché, the truth is that criminals don’t follow the law and making criminals out of law-abiding citizens does nothing to make us all safer.

Again referencing the research, a 2007 study from Harvard University titled “Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?” concluded it would not.  “Stricter laws don’t mean there is less crime”(8).  This was further reinforced by the recent revelation that after more than 20 years, the Brady (gun control) Bill has failed to reduce suicide or homicide (9).  Even the spokespeople for gun control groups frequently admit that so called gun control laws don’t stop criminals from obtaining firearms.  Michael Beard, director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence said, “I would agree that clearly no law is going to prevent criminals from getting handguns or any kind of weapon they want….You can’t take guns away from criminals”(10). Josh Sugarmann of the Violence Policy Center said, “Handgun controls do little to stop criminals from obtaining handguns” (11).

We see further confirming evidence daily.  If gun control laws worked, then the cities of Oakland, Newark and Chicago would be our safest cities rather than some of our most dangerous.  Gun laws don’t work, because they fail to address the actual problem.  Calling for more failed gun laws is a quick emotional, but irrational fix, when we should rather be implementing the following approach as suggested by the CDC,

Effective approaches for preventing violence include early education through school-based programs addressing social, emotional, and behavioral competencies; parent and family-based programs promoting positive relationships, communication, support, and proper supervision; and efforts to improve school, neighborhood, and community environments in ways that reduce the likelihood of violence.Promoting the capacity of communities to implement such approaches might prove essential to achieving population-level impacts.” (12)

As physicians, we all recognize the potential danger of bad prescriptions.  So what could be the harm in disarming law-abiding individuals?  Many independent studies cite research showing that law abiding gun owners use a firearm for self-defense thousands of times every day (13). Ordinary citizens often defend themselves without having to discharge their firearm.   Further, when it comes to protecting victims of violent crime such as rape, a review of Justice Department data from 1979-1985 revealed that when a victim used a gun to resist “stranger” rape the probability of completing the rape was 0.1% and injury to the victim was 0%.  In comparison, unarmed victims suffered the rape act 31% of the time and had other violent injuries 40% of the time (14). Further, as you would expect, gun ownership is most effective in protecting those segments of society who receive the least attention from police.  Hence, personal firearm ownership, and the positive perception thereof, is growing rapidly among urban minorities who own guns as a positive tool for their own protection, as gang violence is an unfortunate reality for them (15)(16).

Yes, we have a persistent problem with violent gangs in some of our inner cities.  The most dangerous of these cities have been run by Democrats for decades (17).  These cities suffer under the failed political policies that killed jobs and broke up families.  As social dynamics collapsed, young people found “family” in gangs.  The illicit-drug industry provided the financial means to survive.  In short, drug-gangs replaced functional households, while entire neighborhoods were ruled by the most violent among them.  According to the FBI’s 2011 National Gang threat Assessment (the last year for which approximate numbers were provided) there are approximately 1.4 million gang members in the United States.  These gang members  “are responsible for an average of 48 percent of violent crime in most jurisdictions and up to 90 percent in several others”(18).   This means that 0.4% of our population is responsible for 48-90% of our violent crime.  Note that California’s new “gun laws” are directed at the 99.6% of our population that isn’t part of the problem.  This is insane.

Conversely, when we remove these same cities from U.S. statistics, our country becomes one of the safest places in the world.  As a matter of fact, in Plano, Texas, where they have amongst the highest number of guns per citizen, their murder rate is so low that if Plano were its own country, it would have the second lowest homicide rate in the world (19).  Clearly we know what works to make us safe…and what doesn’t.  Most politicians realize this, but use gun-control laws as an ineffective crutch because they are unwilling or unable to address the much larger and more difficult issue of inner-city social collapse.  Honest citizens suffer under an obscene number of firearms laws and regulations.

But what can we do right now to decrease violence involving firearms today?

  1. Require all felony convictions to be reported to the National Instant Background Check System (NICS). According to the NRA’s Wayne La Pierre, “38 states submit less than 80% of their felony convictions to the system, leaving more than 7 million felony convictions in the dark.”
  2. Require people who have been adjudicated mentally incompetent and dangerous be reported to the NICS. Again, we can likely agree that people with serious psychiatric issues should also not be able to pass the NICS.
  3. End “gun-free” zones. Criminals simply don’t respect those “gun free zone“ signs and recognize they won’t be immediately faced by armed response.
  4. Stop glorifying violence. Exposure to synthetic violence as seen on television and in video games desensitizes our most vulnerable children and young adults to the real effects of violence (20).
  5. Stop glorifying mass murderers. Never mention their name to deny their sick quest for notoriety.
  6. Demand that prosecutors stop plea-bargaining violent felony level crimes to misdemeanors.
  7. While not a quick solution, we must get involved in our local communities and elect righteous representatives. Simultaneously, we must again teach our young to be responsible. This includes respecting authority, respecting life, and appreciating the importance of community.

In short, I reject Dr. Agarwal’s call for gun-control.  She advocates an ineffective approach while denying the existence of the science that she calls on us to embrace.  She has used an emotional plea to help achieve a political goal that has yet to solve any problems.

On the other hand, I will do my best to implement strategies to effect substantial positive change.  While not all things can be changed, nothing can be changed until it’s faced in earnest.


Gary Gonsalves, M.D. is a board certified, private practice Anesthesiologist in San Diego county.  He sits on the Advisory Board for San Diego County Gun Owners.  Via he has personally overseen the firearms training of hundreds of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals while raising money to support local charities.  He can be reached at

Rob Morse is a design engineer and firearms instructor in Louisiana.  He writes at Ammoland, at his Slowfacts blog, and at Clash Daily.   Rob co-hosts the Polite Society Podcast, and hosts the Self-Defense Gun Stories Podcast each week.



  1. FBI: Uniform Crime Reporting (1993-2012).  Retrieved from:
  2. Perry, Mark J. (2015, December 4). Chart of the Day: More Guns, less violence between 1993 and 2013 [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from.
  3. Crime Prevention Research Center (2016, January). US becoming safer compared to Europe in both fatalities and frequency of mass public shootings:  US now ranks 11th in fatalities and 12th in frequency.  Retrieved from
  4. National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine: Health and Medicine Division (2013, June).  Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence.  Retrieved from
  5. Fabio, Anthony PhD MPH et al (2016, January 15). Gaps continue in firearm surveillance:  Evidence from a large U.S. City Bureau of Police.  Retrieved from
  6. Cook, Philip J (2015, October). Sources of guns to dangerous people:  What we learn by asking them.  Preventative Medicine, Volume 79, pp 28-36.
  7. Agarwal, Rita (2016, August 22). Gun Violence:  When will we make a change?  [Web log post]. Retrieved from
  8. Kates, Don and Mauser, Gary (2007, June1). Would banning firearms reduce murder and suicide? A review of international and some domestic evidence.  Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.  Volume 30 pp 650-685. Retrieved from
  9. Cook, Philip J. (2013). Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy with Evidence and Analysis. Center for Gun Policy and Research, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. pp 22-23.  Retrieved from
  10. Beard, Michael (1979, January 23rd). Press Conference, quoted in Reports from Washington 6, no. 3 [February 13, 1979], p.1
  11. Sugarman, Josh (1987, June).  The NRA Is Right: But We Still Need to Ban Handguns.  Washington Monthly  pp 11-15
  12. Center for Disease Control (2013, August 2). Firearm Homicides and Suicides in Major Metropolitan Areas – United States 2006-2007 and 2009-2010”,  Volume 62(30), pp 597-602
  13. National Academies Press (2013). Priorities for research to reduce the threat of firearm-related violence.  Retrieved from
  14. Kleck, Gary and Sayless, Susan (1990).  Rape and resistance.  Social Problems,  Volume 37(2) 149.
  15. Pew Research Center (2015, August 13). Gun Rights vs Gun Control.  Retrieved from
  16. Pew Research Center (2014, December 10). Growing Public Support for Gun Rights: More say guns do more to protect than put people at risk.   Retrieved from
  17. Investor Business Daily (2016, March 9). How decades of democratic rule ruined some of our finest cities.  Retrieved from
  18. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011). 2011 National Gang Threat Assessment.  Retrieved from
  19. (2002-2014). Crime rate in Plano, Texas:  murders, rapes, robberies, assaults, burglaries, thefts, autothefts, arson, law enforcement employees, police officers, crime map.  Retrieved from
  20. Beresin, Eugene MD (2016). The Impact of Media Violence on Children and Adolescents: Opportunities for Clinical Interventions.  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

But it is Democratic Socialism.. Venezuelan Police Jail Opponents

August 28, 2016

We’ve seen this before-

A prominent Venezuelan opposition leader has been jailed again.  Daniel Ceballos was taken into custody by security teams at 3am and taken to jail.  Fear of another crackdown has made it harder for the opposition to coax its supporters back into the streets.

That sounds familiar.  Now I remember.  Hillary Clinton put an a producer who make crappy x-rated videos into jail after Clinton failed in Benghazi and flailed for a coverup.  Any excuse works when Socialists politicians feel threatened.

This is why we need the second amendment and an armed citizenry.  When citizens are armed, governments use a war of words rather than midnight raids with armed men.  An honorable sheriff doesn’t hurt either.

Paul Lathrop’s Interview on Terrestrial Radio starts Sunday

August 27, 2016

Paul at the park

Some radio programs still broadcast live.  Paul Lathrop will be on live radio shows starting tomorrow, Sunday, August 28th.  Paul will talk about being arrested for a crime with a gun; a crime he didn’t commit.  Paul will also tell you about all the charges being dropped.mark walters

Paul will also be on Mark Walter’s Armed American Radio  tomorrow Sunday August 28th. The show runs from 7pm to 10pm central time.  Paul is in hour one, and the interview starts at 29 minutes.








Tom Gresham

Paul will be on Tom Gresham’s Gun Talk Radio next Sunday September 4th.  The show runs from 1pm to 4pm central time.

Both shows take callers.  You could let them know how you feel after hearing Paul’s story.  Also, both shows are available online, and as a podcasts, if you miss the live broadcast.

Charges Dropped Against Paul Lathrop. His Story-

August 25, 2016

Paul at the parkA friend of mine was arrested at a truck stop.  The incident happened last February.  Paul Lathrop was accused of brandishing a firearm and making terroristic threats.  All charges were dropped earlier this week.  Here is what we can learn.

Paul drives a truck for a living.  He was instructing when this happened.  His student driver was behind the wheel as they moved through a truck stop.  An irate driver who was parked in the lot climbed onto Paul’s truck to yell at Paul’s student.  Paul diffused the situation rather than call 911.  That was a mistake, though no one knew it at the time.

It was a mistake because the irate driver later called police and claimed that Paul threatened him and “waved a silver glock revolver out the window of the truck”.  The irate driver won the race to the phone.  The police therefore considered the irate driver to be the victim.  Video showed otherwise.  The testimony of Paul and his student matched the video and indicated otherwise.  The police only dropped the charges after Paul spent tens of thousands of dollars hiring a lawyer and being dragged through the legal system.  The lawyer had the truck stop video to exonerate Paul.  Here is the important lesson.

The prosecuting attorney in Nebraska would have happily prosecuted and convicted an innocent man.  The only way that justice was done was because a few hundred of us helped Paul pay for his defense.  You only get the justice you pay for.

Thank you to the many people who supported Paul.  We need to have 20 to 30 thousand dollars sitting in the bank to pay for our defense.  If you don’t have those assets, then you should buy “insurance” plans that will pay for your bail and your legal defense.  It is important that you choose a plan that will pay for your defense rather than reimburse you after your trial.  The point being that you’ll have to come up with the $20k out of your own pocket before you would be reimbursed.

Please learn from other peoples’ experience since you probably can’t afford this lesson.  Thank you to the Armed Citizen Legal Defense Network for helping Paul.  The ACLDN did everything they could to help.  They could not write a check because Paul was not a member at the time of the incident.  Paul is a member now.. as am I.

Here are the lessons in brief-

  • Win the race to the phone.
  • Have self-defense “insurance”.
  • Don’t expect “justice” from our legal system.

Here are the podcasts where Paul described the incident, his arrest, his imprisonment, and his defense.

I will link to other interviews as they are released.


You Might be a Modern Liberal if…

August 22, 2016
tags: ,

Today, our Government intrudes into too many areas of our lives. The reason is simple. It is a cornerstone of Socialists dogma that the government knows best. That doesn’t make sense and doesn’t work.  The contradictions should cause our modern liberals heads to explode. For example-

If you think that all police are racist, but you think that only the police should have guns, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think that we need a high minimum wage or else we all would work for free, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think that blacks need the government to get fair treatment, but you would rather face extradition than move your family to a Democrat controlled city like Chicago, Philadelphia or Baltimore, then you might be a modern liberal.

You hate big companies like Walmart because they drive out competition, but you don’t mind forcing children to attend government run schools, then you might be a modern liberal.

You trust the government even though we have not voted a big city politician out of office in years, but you don’t trust companies where you can stop buying their products in a second, then you might be a modern liberal.

You respect an individual’s “right to choose” when a young woman wants to kill her baby, but you’re not “pro-choice” when a young woman wants to protect her children with a gun, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think that you can’t afford to pay your doctor, but you think you can afford to pay a government bureaucrat, pay political bribes and special interests, and still pay your doctor, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think business are corrupt.. until they give your candidate a few hundred million dollars, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think that there are not enough jobs, so we need more laws regulating companies to hire more people, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think we should legalized marijuana because prohibition fails, but you want to make guns illegal because gun prohibition will work, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think taxing gasoline, cigarettes, and alcohol reduces consumption, but you think taxing the rich doesn’t have any effect on starting companies and making jobs, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think you have a right to an abortion because you are in control of your body, but you think it is good policy to force other people to pay for your abortion because other people don’t have control of their body, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think we need a law that forces honest people to register guns, because that way criminals, who break the law for a living, won’t get guns, then you might be a modern liberal.

You are “pro-choice” about vaccinating your children, but are against other parents teaching their children at home, then you might be a modern liberal.

You think ordinary people succumb to temptation. That is why we need the government to run our lives.. and because we’ve never seen politicians succumb to temptation.. then you might be a modern liberal.. and probably didn’t read this far.

The larger the state, the smaller the citizen.2000px-Gadsden_flag.svg

Let’s call it Socialist Violence

August 15, 2016


Drug gangs shot 110 people in Chicago last week.  Black men burned parts of Milwaukee after a black thug pointed a stolen gun at a black police officer and the officer shot him.

The Socialists blame the gun.  They call it gun crime and gun violence.  I’ve a better idea.  Let’s blame the politicians who destroyed their cities.  Instead of gun violence, let’s be more accurate.  Let’s call it what it is.  Call it Socialist violence.

Look at our deep blue cities.  Blaming the gun hides their failed economy and the surge in drug use.  True, drug gangs pull the trigger.  It is true that gangs shoot each other and innocent victims.  We have gangs because of our failed welfare policy and our failed drug policy.  We have gangs because of our failed immigration policy.  Drug gangs flourish when we’ve destroyed the family and the local economy.  Those faults lie with our Socialists politicians.

Fixing those faults is hard.  It is far easier for a Socialist politician to go in front of a camera and blame the gun.  Our socialist media doesn’t bother to ask politicians the hard questions.  Journalists don’t ask why violent crime is ten times higher in Saint Louis, Missouri than in comparably sized Mesa, Arizona.  They don’t ask why violent crime is ten times higher in Baltimore, Maryland than in comparably sized El Paso, Texas.  Compare Milwaukee to El Paso while you are at it.  Philadelphia is seven times worse than San Diego.  I’ll tell you why.  The difference is in our laws.  Socialist politicians build these failed cities.  Socialists voters elected their politicians.

Socialist politicians in our deep blue cities blame the gun.  That hides their failed families and failed government schools.  Look at Chicago.  Chicago politicians drove out businesses with their taxes, regulations and corrupt kickback schemes.  Chicago politicians drove the middle class out of Chicago and imported an  underclass.  Chicago politicians destroyed the black family and the black culture.  The policies of Socialist politicians gave us generations of fatherless boys who grow up in body, but not in spirit.  These misfit men join gangs.

I blame the politicians.  Their Socialist social policy destroyed Chicago, one broken life at a time.  Chicago thugs set a new record with 110 people shot in one week.  The shallow Chicago politicians proposed to raise the level of crushing taxation.. again.

We elected these problem politicians into office.  It is easier for Socialist voters to blame the gun than themselves.

Call it Socialist violence.

I gave you 800 words.  Please leave a like, share, or a comment.

Former CalPERS chief sentenced to prison in bribery scandal- Sac Bee

August 15, 2016

Calpers is the state agency that invests the pensions of California State Employees.  The pensions are hugely underfunded.  The pension managers would all be jailed if Calpers were a private pension organization.  California tax payers will pay the shortfall. RM


Fred Buenrostro, the former chief executive of CalPERS, was sentenced Tuesday by a federal judge who called his actions “a spectacular breach of trust.”

Buenrostro, 66, pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge nearly two years ago, admitting he took more than $250,000 in cash and other bribes from his friend and former CalPERS board member Alfred Villalobos. Prosecutors said Villalobos was attempting to steer pension fund investments to the private equity firms he represented.

Read more here:

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 699 other followers

%d bloggers like this: