Skip to content

Disputed Facts in the Gun Debate

May 30, 2019

The gun debate is difficult for many reasons. It is often an emotional issue. Unfortunately, there isn’t one gun debate, but perhaps dozens of “gun debates.” Even the questions that seem simple are difficult to answer well.

Difficult questions about our guns

  • Are guns too easy to get?
  • Does a firearm in your home put you at greater risk?
  • How often do ordinary citizens defend themselves with a firearm?

A simple answer is easy to find.. and often wrong. There are questions hidden within questions as we look for the truth.

Is the US violent because of civilian gun ownership?

For some people, the gun issue is one of appearance. Many legal residents own guns here in the USA. We also see lots of news coverage when innocent people are shot. We don’t read about the violence in other countries, so we assume that other countries are peaceful. We put these facts together and conclude that guns cause violent crime here in the US.

It turns out that our news is biased in favor of reporting local violent crime. Other countries have violent crime also, but you have to look to find it. What is unusual, is that only a few cities in the USA cause most of our murders. To be precise, two percent of our counties have 51 percent of our murders. 54 percent of our counties have no murders at all.

The stereotypical gun owners is a rural farmer, but it is our failed inner cities where we see the most violence. The myths about gun owners are not real. Bad governance causes violent crime, not guns.

Are guns too easy to get?

You might think it is easy to get a gun if you’ve never gone through the process of buying one. There are 23 thousand firearms regulations. Honest gun owners follow every one of them. Most of these restrictions have no effect on violent crime. The reason is that 99 percent of criminals get their firearms illegally. Passing another gun law doesn’t change the behavior of criminals, and criminals are the ones who commit violent crime.

If you think it is easy for an honest citizen to buy a gun, then I encourage you to try and buy one in California or New Jersey. Criminals don’t have to wait for a 10 day waiting period or a one-gun-a month delay. It can take you months to buy a gun legally, while a criminal gets a new gun in an hour on the street. Gun laws don’t stop criminal behavior.

Does a firearm in your home put you at greater risk, or does it make you safer?

There are hidden layers to that simple question. Most criminals run away when they find out you’re at home. Most criminals run away when they see the homeowner or shop owner has a gun for self-defense. Was that an example of armed self-defense even if gun owner never pressed the trigger?

It turns out that criminals behave toward us the same way they behave toward the police. Like us, the police will touch their firearm dozens of times yet never have to press the trigger as they face a violent encounter. The policeman thinks things would have gone very differently if he were unarmed. Likewise, criminals behave differently when they have unarmed victims.

Many homeowners don’t report that they had a gun in their hand when the criminal ran away. Most law enforcement agencies don’t keep statistics on civilian self-defense. That means it is hard to get solid data when guns save lives.

We also have dirty data when it comes to firearms accidents. Did a child find an improperly stored firearm and hurt someone? We want to keep our guns away from our children and unauthorized strangers.

Unfortunately, we get confusing reports after an accident involving a firearm. Was the gun improperly stored by the legal gun owner, or was the gun stuffed under the couch cushions by a criminal who was visiting his girlfriend for the night? Did children find the gang’s gun that was hidden under the front steps? Was the unauthorized person who got the gun your 4 year old who found it in the dresser drawer, or a 19 year old burglar who smashed his way into your house and used a pry bar to open your lock box? The data is often confusing since both are described as negligent discharge of a firearm by an unauthorized minor. We don’t want to lump these events together since the cure for each is dramatically different.

How often do ordinary citizens defend themselves with a firearm?

From the best data that I can find, self-defense is rare and accidental injuries with a legally owned firearm are extremely rare. Most “injuries” with a firearm are suicide by middle-age white men. For perspective, about one-out-of-5-million children will find and misuse an improperly stored firearm this year. About one-out-of-200 of us will use a firearm to legally defend ourselves or another innocent party. That means your legally owned gun makes you safer. With a little education, some training, and safe storage, your gun makes you much safer.

I wish I had short and simple answers to the gun debate. I chose to give you the best truth I have even though it took a little longer.


Murders in US very concentrated: 54% of US counties in 2014 had zero murders, 2% of counties have 51% of the murders

A Second Look at a Controversial Study About Defensive Gun Use

Suicide Statistics


Please leave a comment and share this article with a friend. RM

8 Comments leave one →
  1. MaddMedic permalink
    May 30, 2019 8:25 am

    Reblogged this on Freedom Is Just Another Word….


  2. Gordon permalink
    May 31, 2019 8:58 am

    1 out of 200 sounds like a small number for self defense until you realize that equates to approximately 1,750,000 times.

    Liked by 1 person

    • May 31, 2019 9:28 am

      Add those statistics up year after year. Add them across your family. Odds are that you will see someone in your family victimized in your lifetime.


  3. 2ABill permalink
    May 31, 2019 8:44 pm

    So here’s a thought: Let’s stipulate that the anti gunners are correct; that having a gun in your home raises your risk of injury. But then:

    1) Those who have lawnmowers are at a greater risk of injury due to contact with the blade directly, or by contact with debris flung by the blade.
    2) Those who cook at home are at greater risk of injury (from mild cuts to fairly gruesome wounds) – particularly if they have a dull knife. I’m proof of at least the mild cuts, and I’ve seen photos of some pretty gruesome kitchen wounds.
    3) People who drive are at greater risk of death or maiming than people who don’t own cars.

    And so on.

    Everything is a trade-off – there are no perfect situations. What’s at the heart of the debate is whether or not the benefit is worth the assumed risk. Per research from Dr. Gary Kleck (and recently discovered study results buried by the CDC), it would seem that the benefits vs. risk are inarguable for the honest citizen. Not so much for the criminal plying his or her trade.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. June 2, 2019 8:22 pm

    Reblogged this on depolreablesunite.

    Liked by 1 person


  1. Weekend Knowledge Dump- June 14, 2019 | Active Response Training
  2. KR Training June 2019 Newsletter – Notes from KR

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: