Skip to content

Big Government Can’t Fight Terrorism at Home

April 25, 2016

Both French and US government officials spoke about terrorism this month.  They again proposed to disarm innocent citizens.  They said the government would protect citizens from terrorists .. given enough time.  We’ve seen the body count from that failed idea.  We’ve also seen how armed citizens succeed and stop mass murder again and again.  Unfortunately, government officials are blind to the need for armed citizens.  Armed citizens are outside the politically correct list of big government solutions.  Citizens will have to solve this problem without government help.

bataclan bodies after muslim attack crop

french theater after a muslim attack

The French interior minister spoke this week.  He said the ministry had learned important lessons.  The ministry now understood the recent violent Muslim attacks in both Paris and Brussels.  After much discussion, the ministry now guaranteed that police and military anti-terrorism units would respond to any terrorist attack in 20 minutes or less.

Civilians will have seconds to respond,

yet the French interior ministers promised help in 20 minutes.

Twenty minutes is long enough for a terrorist group to take hostages and take control of a concert hall .. again.  20 minutes gives terrorists time to plant bombs in a soccer stadium or a major hotel .. again.  A few Muslim terrorists could kill hundreds of people in an airport in 20 minutes .. again.  It seems the French interior minister didn’t learn his lessons at all.

On the other hand, the lesson for the French people is painfully clear.  The death of French citizens is politically acceptable no matter how many are killed.  That is a bitter pill to swallow.  My readers in the United States are shocked at the French government’s indifference to dead french civilians.  Please consider this next news story before we Yanks feel superior.


Nooga TN windows on the soul

US recruiting center after a muslim attack

Senior US military leaders spoke earlier this month.  They said that US troops should stay disarmed on US bases.  Our soldiers should call for help when they are attacked.  We’ve had Muslims murder US servicemen at Fort Hood and recruiting centers in Chattanooga.  Waiting for help to arrive left many servicemen dead.

We’ve already seen how poorly that solution works.

We’ve seen our soldiers killed at home.

It is clear that senior US military leaders will allow soldiers to be killed and wounded again.  As with french citizens, dead US soldiers are viewed as acceptable domestic casualties so that senior government officials can serve their political masters.  It makes me sick that US military leaders are so politically correct and personally pliable.  I don’t feel much better about the French Interior Minister.  In both countries, the central government asks innocent civilians to wait and die until government forces arrive.

Almost anything is a better solution to protect French citizens.  Almost anything is a better solution to protect US troops.  Both governments disarm innocent citizens and leaving them as vulnerable targets.  Presenting disarmed citizens as bait for terrorists is a horrible idea.  Almost any other solution would invite fewer terrorist attacks.

In most of the United States, as in Switzerland and Israel, armed citizens are the distributed defense that is always at the scene of mass public violence.  We’ve seen armed civilians stop mass murder time after time.  Unfortunately, that solution fails the big government political test.  Armed citizens don’t increase government funding.  There isn’t a government bureau of the armed civilian with a multi-billion-dollar budget and huge contracts with political kickbacks.  Instead, interior ministers and military leaders stay stuck on stupid with their politically correct ideas.  I wish they would consider something different rather than stay trapped inside the politically correct box.Pizza-box


What is outside the box?  The French could invite a US pizza restaurant chain to offer guns as an option with their pizza deliveries.  That way the guns and ammo would arrive in 15 minutes or less, or the gun and pizza are free.  😉



amazon boxFor an international flavor, the French could allow Amazon drones to deliver handguns directly to the disarmed French citizens who need them.  Amazon might drop the delivery charges if you’re an Amazon Prime customer. 😉


Instead, we get more of the politically correct status quo.  The same old bad solutions will deliver more of the same old dead citizens.  That outcome works for big government politicians.

There is a lesson here for all of us.  Big government can only think in terms of big government solutions. Small distributed solutions that actually work are never considered because they don’t provide concentrated political profits for politicians.  We’re asking an elephant to dance.  It can’t.

Shame on us for asking our government to again fix a problem of personal protection.  The last time we asked the government for help with personal security we got the Transportation Safety Administration.  I’m tired of having government employees grab my ass.  It is time we learned.

revolver CC

Pants on, gun on

We already have a solution at hand.  It is available in seconds rather than minutes.  Now we need to get government out of the way.

Pants on, Gun on.  It worked before.  It will work again.



2 Comments leave one →
  1. KUETSA permalink
    April 25, 2016 10:09 pm

    Dead citizens are no threat to government power and control – armed citizens ARE a threat to government power and control. Citizens are plentiful enough to be considered expendable. (And new ones are constantly flooding across the border.) The personal safety of each individual citizen is of no importance. Collective security for a stable progressive socialist state is achieved by removing the relevance of, and concern for, the individual.


  2. Rich permalink
    April 26, 2016 8:50 am

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: