Skip to content

Ban on 205 Different ‘Assault Weapons’ Introduced by Sen. Feinstein

March 14, 2021

I told you so. So called “assault weapons” and magazine bans are only the beginning. Ask yourself why the police need “weapons of war” but you don’t. RM

“Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Thursday introduced a ban on more than 200 “assault weapons” after the House passed two gun-control measures pertaining to background checks.

“Her bill (pdf), called the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2021,” is co-sponsored by 34 Senate Democrats and would ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds—similar to the bans on magazines in New York state and California.”

Source: Ban on 205 Different ‘Assault Weapons’ Introduced by Sen. Feinstein

5 Comments leave one →
  1. March 14, 2021 12:02 pm

    How about forced retirement for politicians over 65; Especially treasonous snakes?
    That would take care of the worst ones.


  2. KUETSA permalink
    March 14, 2021 2:18 pm

    WHY NOT!???!
    Works GREAT at the state level!
    Federal district courts approve – NO PROBLEM!
    SUPREME COURT? . . . Seems to be OK . . . Eight years have gone by with MILLIONS of American Gun Owners having their second Amendment rights relegated to an Australian type ALLOWANCE to firearms and magazines deemed HARMLESS ENOUGH for Anti-Constitutional politicians to be comfortable “allowing” . . . for now, until the NEXT incremental INFRINGEMENT.


    . . . Think Joe Manchin will “go for it”???


  3. Thomas Moore permalink
    March 14, 2021 2:55 pm

    I would REALLY like to remind gun grabbers that the very purpose of my guns is to fight and resist ANY enemy and that includes my own government. Politicians first.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. March 15, 2021 11:05 am

    Disarm them and take away their security…Grab a beer and watch what happens…


  5. Thomas Moore permalink
    March 15, 2021 1:26 pm

    Answer to your question “why do police need weapons of war” is because they need such to shoot and kill their enemies. My reason is exactly the same and includes to wage war on enemies foreign and DOMESTIC now did I just make a threat? And who would be a “domestic enemy” why the very ones who threaten to take away my guns that’s who and they dang well know it that’s why they are so scared of Americans having guns = that those guns can be turned on politicians. Actually I’m just paraphrasing what our founding fathers said.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: