Skip to content

Second Amendment | Peruta | 9th Circuit

June 9, 2016

From the blog “Legal Insurrection” with a post by Andrew Branca-

In short, today’s 9th Circuit decision states that:

We hold that the Second Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.


The majority arrives at this conclusion having applied intermediate scrutiny, rather than either strict scrutiny (almost invariably finds a constraint to be unconstitutional) or rational basis (almost invariably finds a constraint to be constitutional), to the dispute. In District of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court held that rational basis was an inappropriate level of scrutiny to evaluate claims of Second Amendment infringement, but left open the door for intermediate scrutiny.

Source: Second Amendment | Peruta | 9th Circuit

Give Legal Insurrection a read.  It is well worth it.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: