Skip to content

Repost- Should anti-gun politicians be denied armed security? | Examiner.com

December 30, 2015

Should Politicians have paid security details.. particularly when these politicians want to deny a citizens right to bear arms? Please leave a comment.- RM

Fox News is reporting this morning that a Virginia state senator is making good on his promise to push for defunding armed bodyguards for anti-gun Gov.

Source: Should anti-gun politicians be denied armed security? | Examiner.com

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. KUETSA permalink
    December 31, 2015 1:36 am

    YES – And Michael Bloomberg should be forced to give up his heavily armed 17 man security team that surrounds his hypocritical ass 24-7 even in the gun free utopia of Bermuda, where he spends most of his time at his estate compound. Even though police are unarmed in Bermuda, Bloomberg $WORKED$IT$OUT$ so his security team could remain heavily armed. PROOF that gun free zones are useless for safety. Bloomberg just feels safer with HIM being the ONLY ONE behind firearms – I guess his $$$ make him feel entitled – peace through superior firepower? EVERYONE ELSE IS EXPENDABLE – scum peasants.

    (Secretary): “Mr. Bloomberg, THE PEASANTS ARE REVOLTING!”
    (Mr. Bloomberg): “Yes they are, . . . QUITE revolting!”

    Like

  2. December 31, 2015 1:34 pm

    Yes And this would go for the any President that push gun control

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: